toxicity of spinosad in control of susceptible and field populations of house fly, musca domestica l. (diptera: muscidae)

نویسندگان

منا شریفی فرد

دانشجوی دکتری حشره شناسی، گروه گیاهپزشکی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شهید چمران ([email protected]) محمد سعید مصدق

استاد حشره شناسی گروه گیاهپزشکی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شهید چمران بابک وزیریان زاده

استادیار گروه انگل شناسی و قارچ شناسی پزشکی، دانشکده پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی جندی شاپور اهواز علی زارعی محمودآبادی

دانشیار گروه انگل شناسی و قارچ شناسی پزشکی، دانشکده پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی جندی شاپور اهواز

چکیده

toxicity of spinosad was primarily evaluated with three bioassay methods: feeding, spraying (residual exposure) and combination with larval medium against one susceptible and one field population. feeding method was selected as efficient method for survey of susceptibility or resistance of seven field populations. in feeding bioassay method, spinosad ld50 of susceptible strain at 24h and 72h were 3.78 and 1.54 g (ai) per gram bait and for ld95 were 5.59 and 3.35g (ai) /g, respectively. ld50 of field populations at 24h ranged  from 3.974- 4.303 and for ld95 from 7.33- 8.30 g (ai)/gr. ld50 at 72h ranged from 1.54- 1.72g/gr and lc95 were 3.31- 3.93 g /g, respectively. determination of lethal dose ratios with lower and upper limits indicated no significant difference between spinosad ld50 of susceptible and field population at 24h and 72h. in residual method, spinosad ldof susceptible and field population (ahds) at 24h were 0.015 and 0.016 and for ld95 were 0.03, 0.033 g (ai) per m2, respectively. at 72h, ldwere 0.0065, 0.007 and ld95 were 0.014, 0.015 g (ai)/ m2 for the above populations. in combination of spinosad with larval medium, ld and ld95 of susceptible population were 9.79 and 29.5 mg (ai) per kg medium. for field population (ahds), ldand ld95 were 9.95 and 56.6 mg (ai)/kg. there was no significant difference at ldof susceptible and field population with these two methods. totally, the result of this study indicated that ld50 values decrease approximately 2-3-fold between 24 and 72 h and all field populations were susceptible to spinosad.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Temporal Variation among Populations of House Fly Musca Domestica (diptera: Muscidae)

Three natural populations of house fly Musca domestica were analyzed for eight genetic loci by means of polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). Allozyme analysis at eight loci scores nineteen putative alleles. The amount of mean observed heterozygosity (Ho) was greater for Varanasi population than the other two populations studied. Nei’s genetic identity (I) and distance (D) values reveal th...

متن کامل

Genotoxic Effects of Heat Stress in House Fly Musca Domestica L. (diptera: Muscidae)

Any deviation in ambient temperature causes stress and disturbs the cellular homeostasis in the organisms. In the present study, genotoxicity induced by exposure of high temperature (40o, 45o and 50oC) has been analyzed in the third instar larvae of common housefly, Musca domestica, by using chromosome aberration assay, micronucleus assay and mitotic index as cytological end points. The adverse...

متن کامل

Seasonal genetic variation in house fly populations, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae).

Seasonal genetic variation was assessed in the common house fly Musca domestica. Allozymes at six gene enzyme system viz., ACPH, EST, G6PD, ME, AO and XDH were analyzed. Fourteen loci with twenty seven alleles were unraveled. The genetic variations were found to be affected to a great extent by environmental influence .F statistics has been used to calculate genetic variation which revealed tha...

متن کامل

Spatial Genetic Variation in House Fly Populations, Musca Domestica (diptera : Muscidae)

Spatial genetic variation was assessed in the common house fly Musca domestica. Allozymes at three gene enzyme system unraveled ten loci which revealed seventeen alleles in house fly populations. F statistics revealed that except ACPH-1 and EST-3 all the other loci show inbreeding (Fis>Fst). Persistent heterozygosity was observed in ACPH-1(Fis= -0.140) which indicate random mating for this locus.

متن کامل

Methods for monitoring outdoor populations of house flies, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae).

Relative collections of house flies were compared on two Florida dairy farms using several monitoring methods: sticky cylinders, baited jug traps (Farnam Terminator and Victor Fly Magnet), and bait strips (Wellmark QuikStrike). Bait strips were placed over collecting pans and under 61 cm square plywood roofs to protect the toxicant from sunlight ("sheltered QuikStrike traps"). Sticky cylinders ...

متن کامل

Evaluation of commercial and field-expedient baited traps for house flies, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae).

A comparison of nine commercial baited fly traps on Florida dairy farms demonstrated that Terminator traps collected significantly more (13,323/trap) house flies (Musca domestica L.) than the others tested. Final Flight, Fly Magnet, and FliesBeGone traps collected intermediate numbers of flies (834-2,166), and relatively few were caught with ISCA, Advantage, Fermone Big Boy, Squeeze & Snap, or ...

متن کامل

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید


عنوان ژورنال:
گیاه پزشکی

جلد ۳۲، شماره ۱، صفحات ۶۵-۷۳

کلمات کلیدی

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023